The Measurement Blind Spot

We're Measuring Construction Waste Wrong.

Current methods, like those used by the EPA, measure construction and demolition (C&D) waste by **weight**. This simple metric creates a distorted picture, masking the true economic and environmental cost of what we throw away. Heavy, low-value materials like concrete dominate the data, while lighter, high-value resources are overlooked. This interactive report reveals why shifting our focus from **weight** to **value** is critical for a sustainable future.

The Official View: Waste by Weight

According to EPA data, C&D waste composition is dominated by incredibly heavy materials. This chart shows the breakdown of 600 million tons of waste generated in 2018. As you can see, concrete and asphalt form the vast majority. This perspective shapes current recycling efforts, focusing on mass over value.

Download the Whitepaper

We have compiled this webpage from a complete whitepaper, written by us and cited accordingly. Download it here
Wasteguard Innovation Whitepaper

Unmasking The Real Impact

What happens when we change the metric from weight to economic value or carbon footprint? The picture changes dramatically. Use the buttons below to toggle the view and see how the importance of different materials shifts. This reveals where the true financial and environmental losses lie.

💰Economic Loss

A single ton of discarded copper represents over **100 times** the economic loss of a ton of concrete. Focusing on weight means we ignore millions in lost value from high-end metals, hardwoods, and engineered lumber.

🌍Material Scarcity

Discarding metals and specialty woods wastes finite resources. Global copper supply is projected to decline, and hardwood sources are under pressure. Recycling these materials is crucial for supply chain stability.

💨Carbon Footprint

Virgin aluminum production has a carbon footprint up to **116 times** greater than concrete per kilogram. Landfilling these high-embodied-energy materials disproportionately contributes to climate change.

Forging a Sustainable Path Forward

Shifting to a value-based approach requires a coordinated effort from policymakers and the industry. Here are key strategies to enhance circularity and capture the true value of C&D materials.

Integrating Value into Policy

  • Update EPA Reporting: Incorporate parallel value-based and environmental impact assessments alongside weight-based data in all national C&D reports to provide a complete picture.
  • Incentivize Value Recovery: Implement tax credits, grants, and reduced fees for projects that demonstrate high rates of value recovery through deconstruction and salvage, not just tonnage diversion.
  • Expand "Buy Clean" Initiatives: Broaden procurement policies to prioritize materials based on high-recycled content, low-embodied carbon, and recovery value, not just production emissions.

Evolving Industry Practices

  • Prioritize Deconstruction: Shift from conventional demolition to systematic deconstruction to salvage intact, high-value components like structural timbers, architectural elements, and metals.
  • Invest in Recovery Tech: Drive innovation in advanced sorting technologies and material identification systems to efficiently separate high-value materials from mixed C&D streams.
  • Develop Reclaimed Markets: Support and expand local and regional reuse centers to facilitate the sale and redistribution of salvaged hardwoods, metals, and other valuable architectural components.